It’s like he missed the headline…
Normally quirksblog is pretty useful reading, but this time it’s like he missed the headline. He opines that Dart will fail miserably because “…(it) will have to be accepted by all other browser vendors.” Perhaps he missed the bit about how Dart can be compiled to JavaScript code for browsers that don’t (and never will) support it natively.
Do I think Dart is a good thing? Probably not, haven’t looked closely enough yet, and I quite like JavaScript. But that’s not really the point. The point is that to call it doomed because it requires vendor buy-in is to mis-read the press release.
